As I was going through the
reading and the lectures for this section the one that I found the most connection
to and the most connection to what my blog is about is, The Future of Public Space by Tridib Banerjee. The most engaging part of the article was the
idea of “engag[ing] in advocacy for parks and open spaces”(Banerjee). This is referring to the need for people to
step up in the community and say that a park or open space has value and helps improve
the quality of life in the neighborhood.
This can be done by peacefully protesting the construction of a building
or opening up negotiations for how to keep the park or open space while bring
the building onto the site, so that the two can work harmoniously. This can only be done by engaging in your own
personal community and trying to understand what can be done to build a better
space for you to thrive. I have seen this
in my own community. While I was growing
up there were three green spaces where I could go and run and just enjoy myself
and that improved my overall experience of childhood. As I grew up those spaces always held
something special to me and I always felt that I understood how important green
spaces and parks were to have in a community.
When I finally had the chance to go to different cities and go to Europe
I learned more about the importance of parks and public spaces. When I went to Chicago a month ago I felt
that if the park system by the lake were not there the city would fail because the
people there would have no escape from the steel and brick of the city. The only way that this was able to happen was
because one man decided that the parks were needed to help in the growth and
prosperity of the city. If one man was
able to do that it makes it possible to believe that I as one architect can
make changes to how green space can be incorporated into very dense populated
areas and make them highly trafficked. When
I went to Europe many of the public spaces were not heavily populated with vegetation,
but they worked in the same way that many other green spaces that I had encountered
in the United States worked. These
spaces have been around for a long time and have worked because the original
idea for that plaza or public space has not lost force or significance with the
passage of time. The people in these
cities find having a place to come, meet, and gather to be important to the way
they live their lives. Having gone to the
places I have personally seen the gathering that happens so naturally in these
plazas that have been around for thousands of years. Living in a city or community means more than
just going to and from work and home and living with our imitate surrounds; it
means involving yourself with the aspects that build your community up and
makes it more sustainable.
Why do you think America hasn't developed open park spaces into it's urban fabric like you see in Europe? Is it just a different way of life or do you like we feel it isn't as necessary to succeed as a community?
ReplyDeleteSo if parks are suck an important piece of peoples lives, then we would probably want a lot of them, but how do you know where to draw the line? Good pieces of land are sparse and expensive in the middle of a big city.
ReplyDeleteMegan-I feel that part of it is a different way of life because they live a more slow and relaxed way that makes that open spaces more used. In the United States we live faster but in family neighborhoods I think parks and open spaces are still very important.
ReplyDeleteNick-That is really true I really enjoyed learning more about how the parks in Chicago were designed and I think that is a good case study. You have to look to at the whole city and decide where the best places for buildings and open spaces and the more I learn from this class, studio, and from going to different cities I feel that I am becoming better at seeing the balance.
This paper was written in 2000. Hope it gave you some ideas about what the author mentioned in his piece has already happened.
ReplyDelete