In many cities in the United States there is rapid
population growth that is not being properly planned and that is causing urban
sprawl. This is being done because many
people need places to live and the layout was based off how the car can move through
the neighborhood. There are other neighborhoods
in this county that were built in with more planning when the growth was not as
intense. These neighborhoods are
Traditional Neighborhood Design. The Sustainable
Cities Institute defines Traditional Neighborhood Design “as a village-style
development, includes a variety of housing types, a mixture of land uses, an
active center, a walkable design and often a transit option within a compact
neighborhood scale area.” This can be
seen in larger cities were a growth created a need to convert warehouses into
places for people to live. In these
places where people had their homes they also needed places to shop and meet. I went to Portland last year and near our
site in the Pearl district there were many different housing types and within a
few blocks was a centralized hub of retailers and a few parks. This was something that I had not seen
before, because where I grew up the residential and commercial were always separated. Throughout the rest of Portland there were
many other examples of this type of neighborhood. These neighborhoods focused on walking but
still had options were driving or public transportation. This compilation or transit types takes what
used to be a small town and brings the idea to larger city and uses transit to
connect all of city. This neighborhood
design is seen in large cities and can be seen in very small towns, but it is
not being integrated into the middle size cities very well. Looking locally at Moscow there is a great possibility
for it to be a great example of what traditional neighborhood design, but because
of the expansion to the west with a large mall complex and to the east with
residential it takes away from the centralized downtown. There are more examples such as Idaho Falls, Missoula,
and Dillion; or a larger city such as Las Vegas. This type of urban design comes from an idea
that people have in America needing a house and a white picket fence. Many people in America cannot afford to buy a
house, but are still forced to because there is no other option where they
live. To create the traditional neighborhoods
of the future there needs to be more multipurpose buildings, or large scale
apartments that can used for families. This
is going to take a change in the idea of the American public to understand the
state of the environment and how much land can be taken up by buildings before
resources cannot longer keep up. One
idea that Moscow has that some other the previous examples do not have is there
are already some multipurpose buildings, mostly in the downtown area. I believe this was done because of the need
for apartments for students of the U of I to want to live off campus. This can be seen with the Garden Lounge and
Mingles that both have apartments above, and in the case of the Garden Lounge
also has a pizza place in the same building complex. I do not believe that it should take a
university to start the change in many cities in America, there needs to be an
education about where we live and how we interact with what directly surrounds that
space.